Ad  RAD Intel

The Company Fixing Ads Isn't Public Yet – But Insiders Are Investing

You've seen them. The cringey, mistargeted, and downright WTF ads. You sit there wondering why brands are spending billions on content that just leaves you questioning your entire algorithmic existence after seeing it.

RAD Intel is teaching brands - with proprietary tech - how to read the room. Their AI helps brands understand why content works, who it actually resonates with, and what to say next. RAD analyzes real-time audience behavior and predicts what will convert, so brands can stop guessing and start making ads that actually land.

And it's already in serious demand. Fortune 1000 brands like Hasbro, Sweetgreen, Skechers, and MGM are using RAD Intel to level up their marketing - and getting up to 3.5x better results. With $37M+ raised and a valuation that's jumped from $5M to $85M*, it's a bit of a shock that RAD Intel is still pre-IPO. Shares are just $0.60, and investors from Meta, Google, Amazon, and Fidelity Ventures are already in.

So check them out now and get in on the action before then, lest you get stuck in the "I almost invested" cycle of regret.

👉 Click here to secure your shares


DISCLOSURE: This is a paid advertisement for RAD Intel's Reg A offering. Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.radintel.ai.

Nvidia takes EU antitrust regulators to court for probing AI startup Run:ai bid

By Foo Yun Chee

BRUSSELS (Reuters) – U.S. chipmaker Nvidia has sued EU antitrust regulators for accepting an Italian request last year to scrutinise its acquisition of AI startup Run:ai, saying they had flouted an earlier court ruling restricting their merger powers on minor deals.

While the case does not have any impact on the Run:ai deal which was eventually approved by the EU competition watchdog in December last year, a ruling favouring Nvidia may further curb the regulator’s merger power.

Businesses have been concerned in recent years with the European Commission flexing a rarely-used power called Article 22 to assess small deals even though these are below the EU’s merger revenue threshold.

The EU executive says it is concerned about killer acquisitions in which big companies buy startups to shut them down, but companies criticise such moves as regulatory over-reach.

Europe’s highest court, however, in a landmark ruling in September last year said the Commission cannot encourage or accept referrals of deals without a European dimension from national enforcers when the latter do not have the powers to examine such deals under their own national laws.

Nvidia cited the ruling in its lawsuit filed with the Luxembourg-based General Court, Europe’s second-highest, according to a filing on the court website.

“The decision unlawfully accepted a referral request from the Italian Autorità Garante della Concorrenza (AGCM), regarding a transaction that fell below the EU Merger Regulation and member state merger control thresholds, based on the AGCM’s exercise of loosely defined, ex post, discretionary call-in powers,” Nvidia said.

It said regulators’ decision to take up the Italian request breaches principles of institutional balance, legal certainty, proportionality and equal treatment.

The case is T-15/25 Nvidia v Commission.

(Reporting by Foo Yun Chee; Editing by Susan Fenton)